In a recent episode of the Pivot podcast, Scott Galloway, a prominent liberal commentator and professor, reportedly delivered a scathing critique of former President Joe Biden, attributing much of the nation’s current turmoil to what he describes as the “narcissism” of Biden and his family.
Joined by journalist Kara Swisher, Galloway expressed frustration over the Democratic Party’s handling of the 2024 election, particularly the lack of a robust primary process following Biden’s decision to run again.
Galloway’s remarks were stark: he claimed that Biden “severely f*cked this country” by insisting he was fit to lead despite mounting concerns about his health and the effectiveness of his administration.
He argued that this insistence left the Democrats without a viable alternative, particularly criticizing then-Vice President Kamala Harris as an inadequate candidate.
“Biden’s legacy has been ruined by this narcissism,” Galloway stated emphatically, referencing the former president’s recent health issues, including a cancer diagnosis.
He acknowledged that many sympathize with Biden’s personal struggles, yet he maintained that the broader implications of his presidency are dire.
Swisher echoed Galloway’s sentiments, suggesting that Democrats should publicly acknowledge their missteps. “Joe Biden betrayed us,” she asserted, urging the party to confront the reality of their situation.
She criticized the backlash they faced for questioning Biden’s candidacy, describing it as a form of “derangement syndrome” among die-hard supporters.
The discussion delved into the implications of Biden’s leadership style and the Democratic Party’s strategy, or lack thereof.
Galloway proposed a more dynamic approach to the primaries, arguing for a “mini shark tank” format that would allow emerging candidates to showcase their abilities.
He lamented that such measures were not taken, allowing Donald Trump to dominate the media narrative while Biden remained largely out of the public eye.
While acknowledging Harris’s performance during the debates, Galloway concluded that she was not a strong candidate overall.
He noted that her campaign had faltered before, citing her failure to gain traction in earlier primaries.
Swisher and Galloway agreed that the party needed to regroup and devise a new strategy moving forward.
As the conversation unfolded, it became clear that both hosts felt a sense of urgency for the Democratic Party to recalibrate.
They emphasized the importance of transparency with voters, advocating for a more candid acknowledgment of past mistakes and a commitment to change.
In their view, the path forward requires not just a change in leadership but a fundamental reassessment of how the party engages with its constituents and prepares for future elections.
[READ MORE: Judge Moves to Block Trump Admin From Banning Foreign Students From Harvard]
